Recent news in Japan allege declining trend of academic achievement in elementary to middle school students compared to other nations. Most analysis conclude “education with latitude” as the root cause. Japanese education attempted to let students relax and set them free from cramming approach.
Trigger of this discussion is disappointing Japan’s result at 6th place in an international assessment;
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), carried out by OECD. The result suggests Japanese students ability to apply fundamental mathematics to science. BTW, USA is around #20.
Reading the full report, population sampling method and population segment needs more description to illustrate validity of study. (Perhaps the report intentionally worked around with it due to insufficient data.) Statistical analysis tells a wrong story sometimes if it is not used correctly; A simple example is TOEFL. Japanese students have considerably low TOEFL score globally as virtually everyone take TOEFL in Japan, where students from less developed nations take TOEFL for purpose. Therefore, a hypothesis that Japanese students have lower English ability, is subject to rejection. I can confidently say that my former classmates in Japan have equal or higher English application ability compared to fellow international students at Johns Hopkins.
However, PISA’s assessment tells some significant story setting aside some insufficient methodologies. Why lower the standard of achievement and discourage competition at school? - It makes no sense.
Personally, I am in the age group which had to go to school on Saturdays, but now Japanese students enjoy full 2 day weekends just like in America. I liked Saturdays because that was the day when I can go hang out with friends after school. Especially when I was in high school, I enjoyed going to record shops and go to book store to read books which I could not afford with allowances. Saturday was a day to cultivate intellectual curiosity. I don’t know how my Saturday was if it was off every week. Perhaps I played sports more. It is starting to sound like it is better to go to school on Saturday. But it is not my intention.
What is the magnitude of “education with latitude” that continued for a decade? My impression is that this policy just widens educational divide; meaning children from wealthier family can attend cram school on Saturdays and children from poor family just stay home and play. Of course, distribution of score will widen. From high end, high score students don’t waste time in low quality education in public school and focus on cram school material to score even higher. From low end, low score students don’t get enough opportunity to improve their score.
Perhaps we should all learn from Finland, the country always on #1 in the ranking.
Project Finland.